Abstract
Over the past few years, it has become apparent that approximately 35% of the human proteome consists of intrinsically disordered regions. Many of these disordered regions are rich in short linear motifs (SLiMs) which mediate protein–protein interactions. Although these motifs are short and often partially conserved, they are involved in many important aspects of protein function, including cleavage, targeting, degradation, docking, phosphorylation, and other posttranslational modifications. The Eukaryotic Linear Motif resource (ELM) was established over 15 years ago as a repository to store and catalogue the scientific discoveries of motifs. Each motif in the database is annotated and curated manually, based on the experimental evidence gathered from publications. The entries themselves are submitted to ELM by filling in two annotation templates designed for motif class and motif instance annotation. In this protocol, we describe the steps involved in annotating new motifs and how to submit them to ELM.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Fukuchi S, Hosoda K, Homma K et al (2011) Binary classification of protein molecules into intrinsically disordered and ordered segments. BMC Struct Biol 11:29. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6807-11-29
Selkoe DJ (1991) The molecular pathology of Alzheimer’s disease. Neuron 6:487–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/0896-6273(91)90052-2
Mandelkow EM, Mandelkow E (1998) Tau in Alzheimer’s disease. Trends Cell Biol 8:425–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0962-8924(98)01368-3
Tompa P (2010) Structure and function of intrinsically disordered proteins. Chapman & Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton
Tompa P, Davey NE, Gibson TJ et al (2014) A million peptide motifs for the molecular biologist. Mol Cell 55:161–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2014.05.032
Van Roey K, Uyar B, Weatheritt RJ et al (2014) Short linear motifs: ubiquitous and functionally diverse protein interaction modules directing cell regulation. Chem Rev 114:6733–6778. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr400585q
Bardwell AJ, Flatauer LJ, Matlukuma K et al (2001) A conserved docking site in MEKs mediates high-affinity binding to MAP kinases and cooperates with a scaffold protein to enhance signal transmission. J Biol Chem 276:10374–10386. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M010271200
Zeke A, Bastys T, Alexa A et al (2015) Systematic discovery of linear binding motifs targeting an ancient protein interaction surface on MAP kinases. Mol Syst Biol 11:837. https://doi.org/10.15252/msb.20156269
Gibson TJ (2009) Cell regulation: determined to signal discrete cooperation. Trends Biochem Sci 34:471–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2009.06.007
Davey NE, Travé G, Gibson TJ (2011) How viruses hijack cell regulation. Trends Biochem Sci 36:159–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2010.10.002
Via A, Uyar B, Brun C et al (2015) How pathogens use linear motifs to perturb host cell networks. Trends Biochem Sci 40:36–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2014.11.001
Puntervoll P (2003) ELM server: a new resource for investigating short functional sites in modular eukaryotic proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 31:3625–3630. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkg545
Gouw M, Michael S, Sámano-Sánchez H et al (2018) The eukaryotic linear motif resource—2018 update. Nucleic Acids Res 46:D428–D434. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx1077
Bateman A (2019) UniProt: a worldwide hub of protein knowledge. Nucleic Acids Res 47:D506–D515. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky1049
Hornbeck PV, Kornhauser JM, Latham V et al (2019) 15 years of PhosphoSitePlus ® : integrating post-translationally modified sites, disease variants and isoforms. Nucleic Acids Res 47:D433–D441. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky1159
Gibson TJ, Seiler M, R a V (2013) The transience of transient overexpression. Nat Methods 10:715–721. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2534
Gibson TJ, Dinkel H, Van Roey K et al (2015) Experimental detection of short regulatory motifs in eukaryotic proteins: tips for good practice as well as for bad. Cell Commun Signal 13:42. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12964-015-0121-y
Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z et al (2000) The protein data bank. Nucleic Acids Res 28:235–242. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/28.1.235
Van Roey K, Dinkel H, Weatheritt RJ et al (2013) The switches.ELM resource: a compendium of conditional regulatory interaction interfaces. Sci Signal 6:rs7. https://doi.org/10.1126/scisignal.2003345
Rawlings ND, Waller M, Barrett AJ et al (2014) MEROPS: the database of proteolytic enzymes, their substrates and inhibitors. Nucleic Acids Res 42:503–509. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt953
El-Gebali S, Mistry J, Bateman A et al (2019) The Pfam protein families database in 2019. Nucleic Acids Res 47:D427–D432. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky995
Letunic I, Bork P (2018) 20 years of the SMART protein domain annotation resource. Nucleic Acids Res 46:D493–D496. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx922
Orchard S, Ammari M, Aranda B et al (2014) The MIntAct project--IntAct as a common curation platform for 11 molecular interaction databases. Nucleic Acids Res 42:D358–D363. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt1115
Velankar S, Alhroub Y, Best C et al (2012) PDBe: Protein Data Bank in Europe. Nucleic Acids Res 40:402–410. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr998
Dinkel H, Chica C, Via A et al (2011) Phospho.ELM: a database of phosphorylation sites--update 2011. Nucleic Acids Res 39:D261–D267. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkq1104
Federhen S (2012) The NCBI taxonomy database. Nucleic Acids Res 40:136–143. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr1178
Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA et al (2000) Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The gene ontology consortium. Nat Genet 25:25–29. https://doi.org/10.1038/75556
NCBI Resource Coordinators (2017) Database resources of the National Center for biotechnology information. Nucleic Acids Res 45:D12–D17. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw1071
Piovesan D, Tabaro F, Paladin L et al (2018) MobiDB 3.0: more annotations for intrinsic disorder, conformational diversity and interactions in proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 46:D471–D476. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx1071
M a S (2008) The importance of stupidity in scientific research. J Cell Sci 121:1771. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.033340
Kanehisa M, Sato Y, Furumichi M et al (2019) New approach for understanding genome variations in KEGG. Nucleic Acids Res 47:D590–D595. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky962
Fabregat A, Jupe S, Matthews L et al (2018) The Reactome pathway knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Res 46:D649–D655. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx1132
Gouw M, Sámano-Sánchez H, Van Roey K et al (2017) Exploring short linear motifs using the ELM database and tools. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics 58:8.22.1–8.22.35. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpbi.26
Altschul S (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25:3389–3402. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/25.17.3389
Piovesan D, Tabaro F, Mičetić I et al (2017) DisProt 7.0: a major update of the database of disordered proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 45:D219–D227. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw1056
Schad E, Fichó E, Pancsa R et al (2018) DIBS: a repository of disordered binding sites mediating interactions with ordered proteins. Bioinformatics 34:535–537. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btx640
Fichó E, Reményi I, Simon I et al (2017) MFIB: a repository of protein complexes with mutual folding induced by binding. Bioinformatics 33:3682–3684. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btx486
Mészáros B, Erdös G, Dosztányi Z (2018) IUPred2A: context-dependent prediction of protein disorder as a function of redox state and protein binding. Nucleic Acids Res 46:W329–W337. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky384
Oates ME, Romero P, Ishida T et al (2013) D2P2: database of disordered protein predictions. Nucleic Acids Res 41:508–516. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks1226
Linding R, Russell RB, Neduva V et al (2003) GlobPlot: exploring protein sequences for globularity and disorder. Nucleic Acids Res 31:3701–3708. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkg519
Mitchell AL, Attwood TK, Babbitt PC et al (2019) InterPro in 2019: improving coverage, classification and access to protein sequence annotations. Nucleic Acids Res 47:D351–D360. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky1100
Kerrien S, Orchard S, Montecchi-Palazzi L et al (2007) Broadening the horizon--level 2.5 of the HUPO-PSI format for molecular interactions. BMC Biol 5:44. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7007-5-44
Waterhouse AM, Procter JB, Martin DMA et al (2009) Jalview version 2--a multiple sequence alignment editor and analysis workbench. Bioinformatics 25:1189–1191. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp033
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Rita Pancsa and Athina Diakogianni for their valuable feedback on the manuscript and the team of annotators and curators who have contributed their time, knowledge, and efforts to the ELM database. JC was supported by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement No. 675341 (PDZnet).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Gouw, M. et al. (2020). How to Annotate and Submit a Short Linear Motif to the Eukaryotic Linear Motif Resource. In: Kragelund, B.B., Skriver, K. (eds) Intrinsically Disordered Proteins. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 2141. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-0524-0_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-0524-0_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-0716-0523-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-0716-0524-0
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols